Articles Posted in Long Term Care Planning

All medical care is expensive. Many people are shocked when they get a medical bill covering costs for even minor incidents, emergency room visits, or very short hospital stays. Consider then what the costs must be for care that occurs every day for month or years–it is staggering. That is the prism through which nursing home costs should be examined. While the traditional skilled nursing home does not necessarily provide the same comprehensive care as an actual hospital, the costs of ensuring around-the-clock access to certain medical treatments is incredibly expensive.

NY Nursing Home Study

The shocking nature of those expenses were recently verified in a new study. The NY Daily News reported this week on the findings. The results of Genworth’s annual “Cost of Care” survey were revealed, confirming that there is almost nowhere more expensive to receive long-term care than New York. For example, according to the study, on average, a single room in an elder care facility in Manhattan costs a mind-boggling $180,000 per year. And this cost is not some anomaly for that borough. The average yearly cost for a senior in Queens is about $140,000, and a Long Island resident should expect to pay $160,000 each year.

If stereotypes are to be believed, all living arrangements outside of the home are mired in neglect, confusion, and unhappiness. Virtually no one claims that they want to move into a nursing home or assisted living facility, and many assume that leaving one’s house is only done at the last possible minute and often under duress.

This sort of generalizing about the “horrors” of senior care facilities is often misplaced. There are certainly many low-quality homes and individual residents who despise their living situation. But that is not at all to say that every facility–or even a majority–are like that. The truth is that there are many homes that allow residents to thrive, providing support so that their daily lives are more fulfilled than before, when they lived in their own home (often alone) and without necessary assistance with day to day tasks.

On that topic, a recent New York Times “New Old Age” blog post provides some interesting first-person discussion with one of the nation’s “foremost advocate for people living in assisted living,” Martin Bayne.

This week the New York Times published a story that will likely ring true to all those who have gone through the process of helping a loved one figure out how to secure the ideal long-term care. It is one of those issues that is easy to talk about in the abstract but that comes packed with intense emotion when one is actually thrust into it and forced to help those closest to them.

One of the scariest aspects to this situation is that it can arise virtually overnight. The NYT story shares the example of one man whose 81-year old parents seemed to go from swimming and playing sports to both becoming frail the next day. Their ailments struck at the same time. His mother developed dementia and passed away within a year of first falling ill. This left the family in a very tough spot. In the midst of grief, they had to make tough choices about how to ensure their father had proper care. Fortunately, the family was in a much better position than many, because the patriarch had purchased a long-term care insurance policy nearly three decades before. That insurance has been able to provide at-home caregivers for the last two years.

That is a key reason why the NY elder law attorneys at our firm encourage families to use long-term care insurance when possible while crafting long-term care plans.

Sunshine is often the best medicine–particularly when it comes to worries about quality of care and value of public services. When community members are able to easily find out information which explains how much services cost, error rates, and similar details, then efficiency and overall quality will likely improve. That is the idea behind a new “Sunshine Week” project that is being unrolled this week by state officials. As discussed in Business Journal story, the initiative is spearheaded by Governor Cuomo’s office in order to raise awareness of the value of open government.

The project is actually a series of unveilings, all focused on providing data in easily understood formats for residents. Conveniently, the data is all available of a new website: The New York Open Data Portal.

The goal is comprehensive, intending to provide a single location for community members to obtain information about virtually every area of government services, from county-based crime statistics to recommended fishing and river locations. Some aspects of the project may be valuable to area senior citizens and their families. For example, you can view a spreadsheet that lists the specific expenditures from the Office of Aging based on fiscal year and county.

Many of the changes and new rules associated with health insurance as part of the “Affordable Care Act” (Obamacare) will only take effect over the next year or two. One of those new rules prohibits most health insurance providers from making premium pricing decisions based on one’s gender. However, those rules do not apply to companies that provide long-term care insurance.

Therefore it does not come as a huge surprise that the nation’s largest provider of such insurance–Genworth Financial–announced that they will soon being change rate plans to account for the fact that women are more likely to need paid long-term care. According to a Washington Post story, women seeking such insurance on their own will likely see anywhere from a twenty to forty percent increases in yearly long-term care insurance payments. Importantly, the change will only affect new policyholders, as current members should not be affected. Observers note that other long-term care insurance providers will likely follow suit.

The policy change was made, say the company, because of the fact that over ⅔ of all claims on the insurance are made by women. In order to stabilize prices, the company claims that the premium rates needed to better reflect the risk and ultimate need for long-term care. The increased claims by women are likely a product of the fact that they generally live longer and provide care to their own spouses. Men are far likelier to avoid having to make claims on the insurance because their health declines sooner and their spouse often provides care. Elderly women, however, often come to need support after their spouse has passed, and they do not have the luxury of receiving free care from a relative.

Last year federal legislation was passed affecting elder care issues. In particular, the new law eliminated a floundering attempt to create a national long-term care insurance program. At the same time, the law also called for the creation of a commission to study issues of senior care financing, delivery, and workforce needs. Known as the “Long-Term Care Commission,” the general idea was that the diverse Commission would investigate the issues, create policy proposals, and submit the ideas to Congress to spur possible legislation.

The Status Update

Unfortunately, as a recent Forbes story shares, the Commission is still in dock and there are serious doubts as to whether it will be able to achieve its mission at all. The first issue is that the slate of 15 people to sit on the panel have yet to be decided upon. Apparently the White House has yet to make its three choices, and nothing can be done until the roster is actually complete.

Like the every other demographic, many older Americans are struggling with financial challenges. High costs of medication, healthcare, and concerns about the need for possible long-term skilled care often weigh on the minds of those in their fifties, sixties, seventies, and beyond. Retirees often struggle more with comparable financial issues than their younger counterparts, because their ability to increase their income to account for problems is limited.

In fact, a new report issued by the AARP (view here) actually found that one money hurdle–credit card debt–affects seniors more than anyone else.

Consumer Survey & Seniors

The challenges of securing appropriate long-term care are often only understood at the exact moment when that care is needed. After a sudden medical emergency, accident, or other change in condition, many families discover that an elder loved one is in need of long-term help to get by each day. These families then face two difficult questIons: (1) How are we going to pay for it?; (2) How do we know that the quality of the caregivers is sufficient?

For one thing, the financing of long-term care can be secured in many different ways. A NY elder law attorney can explain what options are available in your specific case. Those options may involve insurance, the use of Medicaid Asset Protection trusts, or other unique strategies to save funds even when on the nursing home doorstep. There is no getting around the fact that elder care is quite expensive–startling so–but planning ahead with professionals can save significant sums.

But paying for care is only part of the battle. It is also critical that family members ensure their love ones actually receive the care they deserve, no matter what facility they enter. Sadly, without proper oversight, seniors may face severe neglect or outright abuse by those charged with their well being.

Late last month the New York Health Department released a report that reviews the progress of a crucial shift in state policy affecting seniors needing long-term care. The full report (download it here), outlines the satisfaction of New Yorkers who have participated in the shift from traditional New York Medicaid coverage for long-term care to special HMOs to cover those care and costs. This report offers the first good opportunity to analyze whether these organizational shifts over the past few months have been positive for those seniors directly affected.

Somewhat quietly, thousands of elderly New Yorkers who previously received long-term care via Medicaid were shifted to HMOs managed by by private and non-profit companies. In total, 38 different companies are handling the work and, according to the NY Health Department, “providing high-quality services to consumers and helping them maintain or improve critical abilities associated with daily living.”

The law changed in 2010 to alter the way long-term care was provided by the state. The basic idea is that shifting long-term care costs to HMOs will save funds. In 2010, for example, the state spent more than $13 billion via Medicaid to provide long-term care to 300,000 residents. By shifting to HMOs, the costs will hopefully be kept in check, because the companies will receive a flat fee for patient care overall, regardless of the necessary services.

The fiscal cliff crisis dominated the last month of 2012. Even though an agreement was reached on New Years Day, the compromise is far from the end of partisan political battles and confusion. Observers are already making predictions about the possible implications of the looming “debt ceiling” fight between the White House and certain members of the Republican caucus which must be resolved in the next month or two. The outcome may have significant impacts on the nation’s long-term stability and the performance of the financial sector.

It is easy to see how New Yorkers thinking about their long-term care planning and retirement might be uneasy about the state of affairs. While some things are simply out of your hands, it is critical not to forget that there are smart ways to plan for retirement regardless of the flux in national politics. A recent Forbes article is worth a look, as it explores five of the best way to protect one’s retirement from the federal government’s “fiscal follies.”

Plan Ahead

Contact Information